From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 19:16:01 GMT-3
Aaryn is right
try this funny scenario:
R1--R2
both run EIGRP
R1 interface is 192.168.0.1/24
R2 interface is 192.168.0.2/24
now put ip summary-address eigrp X 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128 on R1's
interface, R2 will no longer be able to ping local interface
Roman
>From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
>Reply-To: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
>To: "'Pickell, Aaryn'" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>, "'Juan Carlos
>Muruchi'" <jmuruchi@yahoo.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Administrative distance
>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:51:39 +0100
>
>Shoot me down in flames now if need be BUT I am having a lapse in
>concentration i.e. too late at night.... the rules of route picking... is
>it
>not directly connected b4 longest match? or does longest match win overall?
>I am sure it is the latter but my brain is now questioning me as if I am
>wrong !!!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pickell, Aaryn [mailto:Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com]
>Sent: 04 June 2001 20:56
>To: 'Juan Carlos Muruchi'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Administrative distance
>
>
>Not that I know of.
>
>You can sort of work around this, though... if you have a /24 network
>directly connected, and you want to use a different route to get to that
>segment, you can use two /25 routes in your routing table. That way, the
>longest match will supercede and you'll take the other path, instead of the
>directly connected.
>
>It's up to you to generate the two /25 routes, though. Statics, or inject
>them into a routing protocol somewhere else... whatever.
>
>Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
>Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
>Getronics Inc.
>Direct: 713-394-1609
>Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
>
>This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
>privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
>immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
>this message and attachments. Thank you.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Juan Carlos Muruchi [mailto:jmuruchi@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Administrative distance
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it is posible to change
> > administrative distance of a directly conected
> > network?
> > If it is posible, how can you do it?
> > Regards,
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:17 GMT-3