From: Martin, Chris (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 17:18:12 GMT-3
Oops i read the question too fast DIRECTLY CONNECTD NETWORK.
I dont think you can change the AD of a directly connected network, however
you could [probably use a access list that qill allow you to use another
route preferabbly instead of the directly connected AD of 0
.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pickell, Aaryn" <Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com>
To: "'Juan Carlos Muruchi'" <jmuruchi@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: Administrative distance
> Not that I know of.
>
> You can sort of work around this, though... if you have a /24 network
> directly connected, and you want to use a different route to get to that
> segment, you can use two /25 routes in your routing table. That way, the
> longest match will supercede and you'll take the other path, instead of
the
> directly connected.
>
> It's up to you to generate the two /25 routes, though. Statics, or inject
> them into a routing protocol somewhere else... whatever.
>
> Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
> Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
> Getronics Inc.
> Direct: 713-394-1609
> Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
>
> This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
> immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
> this message and attachments. Thank you.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Juan Carlos Muruchi [mailto:jmuruchi@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:36 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Administrative distance
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it is posible to change
> > administrative distance of a directly conected
> > network?
> > If it is posible, how can you do it?
> > Regards,
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:17 GMT-3