From: Tomasz Bartel (tbartel@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 16:11:58 GMT-3
Guys,
Sorry form mistake in typing, I mean RFC 1483 not 1488 and 1577 it is
obviously CLIP.
Tomek
At 14:25 01-06-04 -0400, Wojtek Iwanczyk wrote:
>if lane is no longer tested, what is the extent of ATM on the lab ??
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Leonard, Chad [mailto:CLeod@allstate.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:58 PM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: RE: Scope of Lab Study
>
>
>Just a quick note...
>
>Appletalk has been pulled from the lab as of Feb 1st (don't quote me on the
>date). This is per Cisco's website. One less thing to worry about.
>
>Definitely check out the website though. Appletalk is not the only thing
>that was pulled. X.25, Lane, and some others are no longer tested.
>
>Chad Leonard
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@ldd.net]
>Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:11 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Scope of Lab Study
>
>
>I know I can find this on CCO or the Networker pdf files. But I wanted
>double
>check with the list. My R&S lab is three months away and I'm starting to
>buckle down on the studying.
>
>In General the things I need to study for the lab are:
>
>(1) All the Routing Protocols, EIGRP, IGRP, OSPF, BGP, and even IS IS (how
>lame)
>(2) The Complete IP Suite & ACL's
>(3) Desktop Protocols IPX, Appletalk, and DLSW+
>(4) QOS
>(5) VPN
>(6) VOIP
>(7) Some ATM, ISDN, and Dialup
>
>Did I miss anything? What gets me is any one of the seven could keep me
>busy
>for months at a time. I could make a career of just doing BGP or DLSW+,
>etc.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Michael Snyder
>
>
>P.S. Anyone have a good set of aliases they could send me?
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:17 GMT-3