From: Peter Van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 28 2001 - 10:35:26 GMT-3
Personally, I'd not use 0.0.0.255 in any case, lab or otherwise. The full 0's
mask is the safe and accurate way to add interfaces to the OSPF process and unl
ess you need to add 20 odd interfaces, I'd suggest you use it. As far as the l
ab goes, I can attest that lab grading is fair. You shouldn't worry about triv
ial semantics. If your prepared, you'll likely have a good idea when you are u
sing an illegal shortcut.
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 5/28/2001 at 7:48 AM Don Dettmore wrote:
>Question - How nit-picky are the graders of the lab? F0r example,
>something
>occurred to me when I was working in the lab:
>
>192.168.1.0 /24 ------ R1 ----- 1.1.1.0 /29
>
>When configuring R1 for OSPF, would the following be acceptable:
>
>network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0.0.0.0
>
>Or would that be considered wrong because of the 'wrong' (or I should say -
>not specific enough) wildcard mask.
>
>Just wondering how anal I must train myself to be.
>
>Don Dettmore
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:55 GMT-3