From: Patrick (pjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 23:39:53 GMT-3
I heard that the 45XX routers in the lab are getting replace with 36XX. I
know that MPLS will appear in the CS track. This info came right from a
proctor!
As for the RS lab, I would say it may appear someday, They like to keep it
fresh!
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Lennon" <andrew.lennon@nscglobal.com>
To: "Dennis Hartmann" <sanester8@yahoo.com>; "Lachlan Kidd"
<lkidd@netstarnetworks.com>; "Luke M" <luke.mendoza@home.com>; "Ccie
(E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: MPLS
> Dennis,
>
> I am glad you mentioned it as I tried some MPLS configs a while ago only
to
> find that the 25xx router wont run it. I was worried about this as the
lab
> shows equipment that will run MPLS (26xx/36xx)and I can't really do any
> hands on. I can see the used prices of the x6xx and old 45/7xx routers
> going through the roof if MPLS is on th R/S lab. To be honest, I don't
> think it will appear on the R/S lab. SP maybe, but not R/S for the time
> being.
>
> 10 days and ICANREACH
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Dennis Hartmann
> Sent: 25 May 2001 02:53
> To: Lachlan Kidd; Luke M; Ccie (E-mail)
> Subject: MPLS
>
>
> There was a distribute-list bug in one of the 12.0
> trains that we were using in a BSCN class that made
> the router go into core dump and reload. It was
> pretty nasty. I'm sure you will not see it on the
> CCIE, but I thought it was interesting enough to
> measure. Anyone hear of anyone getting MPLS stuff on
> the exam? Is that fair game now?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dennis J. Hartmann
> CCNP/CCDP/CCNA/CCDA/MCSE
> dennisjhartmann@hotmail.com
>
> --- Lachlan Kidd <lkidd@netstarnetworks.com> wrote:
> > Hi Luke,
> > From my experience it's quite simple
> >
> > access-l 1 deny 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.0
> > access-l 1 permit any
> > router eigrp 10
> > distribute-list 1 in null0
> > That usually works for me, let me know how you go.
> > Regards,
> > Lachlan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Luke M
> > Sent: Friday, 25 May 2001 9:51:AM
> > To: Ccie (E-mail)
> > Subject: EIGRP to OSPF without null 0
> >
> >
> > Ok,
> >
> > Here is a scenario that a friend told me about and I
> > just don't get... maybe
> > I lack the right amount of brain cells so forgive me
> > =)
> >
> >
> > tokyo ------- ether0 -----------------ether 0
> > ------------------ sydney
> >
> > tokyo is running EIGRP with about 4 loopbacks
> > 172.16.1.0, 172.16.2.0,
> > 172.3.0, 172.4.0
> >
> > Sydney is running OSPF and EIGRP. I was told to
> > allow 172.16.0.0 ( a
> > summary net) into OSPF without the routing procotols
> > generating a route to
> > Null 0.
> >
> > Ok, so I do a summary for eigrp on interface ether 0
> > in Tokyo. Do a show ip
> > route and I see 172.16.0.0 pointing to null 0 (as it
> > should).
> > How do I get rid of the null 0? I don't think this
> > is possible.
> >
> >
> > Could someone shed some light into this? This is
> > crazy...
> >
> >
> > Luke
> > **Please
> > read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please
> > read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:52 GMT-3