Re: OT: CCIE losing clout?

From: Curtis Phillips (phillipscurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 15:39:26 GMT-3


   
If you don't already know this then perhaps it's time you heard.
Recruiters do not know anything about anything.
I have not met one who truly understood even the positions they were staffing f
or. Most of these people are sales types who are inclined to anything on any gi
ven day depending on what suits there current perpective. Typically, I hold my
nose when dealing with people.

eugeneonline <eugeneonline@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I would suggest that you don't take any notice of this so-called recruiter wh
o clearly doesn't understand what it takes to become CCIE. I am inclined to bel
ieve that it the likes of him that give companies this very wrong impression of
 the quality of CCIE - even a one day old CCIE is someone to be reckoned with.
 Anyone who thinks otherwise is either ignorant or mis-informed: usually ignora
nt of the facts. He mentions experience; hands-on ability is precisely what is
tested on the lab and this is done in the most complex and thorough manner.
>
> The popularity of the certification has grown, the effectiveness of the testi
ng approach remains the same. Also, in a fast changing environment, a newer CCI
E may be more abreast with curent trends than an older one (although you must r
e-certify to retain your status). This was true with Novell and Microsoft certi
fications and certainly so with Cisco certs.
>
> A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; your 'recruiter' is a loose cannon.
Forward this message to him if you can.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eugene Akhanoba
>
>
> Andrew <arousch@home.com> wrote:
> And what was the name of the recruiter and what company?
>
> At 01:26 PM 5/24/01 -0400, Perry Jannette wrote:
> >While talking with a headhunter recently he made these comments.
> >
> >"I don't really work with CCIEs over #6000 cause they're only able to get
> >about 85k cause companies know they don't have the experience. Companies
> >aren't impressed by these 6 and 7 thousand numbers, they might as well send
> >one of their CCNPs out. The 2000 and 3000 numbers are still well respected,
> >with 4000 and 5000's falling in between."
> >
> >Anyone else heard these types of comments?
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions $2 Million Sweepstakes - Got something to sell?
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:52 GMT-3