RE: OT: CCIE losing clout?

From: Yurchenko, Michael (michael.yurchenko@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 14:59:49 GMT-3


   
After dealing with some IT recruiters, I wonder if they were used car
dealers who got fired for being too sleazy...

Michael Yurchenko
Sr. Network Engineer - Verizon Network Integration
CCIE# 6695, CCDP, CCNP ATM Specialist, MCSE
michael.yurchenko@verizon.com
610-407-2154

-----Original Message-----
From: Mask Of Zorro [mailto:ciscokid00@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:48 PM
To: perry.jannette@usa.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT: CCIE losing clout?

Headhunters will try to make you believe anything...

Let's say a guy that has worked for the phone company or a large global
enterprise for 15 years decides one day to go get the CCIE. He studies for a

while, and passes the written, studies for a while longer and passses the
lab.

The same say he passes his lab, some kid who has a total of 6 months
exposure to cisco equipment, but has nothing but time on his hands for
practice, and is sharp as a tack, takes and passes the lab as well.

Now, let's say the both passed the lab last week. Both are new CCIE's with a

current numbers (7000 series).

The guy with the 15 years of industry experience could surely pull down more

than $85K, maybe twice that at some places, while the other kid could
probably pull down $100 right outta the shute.

If this recruiter doesn't think his clients will touch 'em because of the
new number, then he either:

1. sucks at his job
2. is lying about this
3. is just an idiot

It could be some combination of any or all of the three...

Z

>From: "Perry Jannette" <perry.jannette@usa.net>
>Reply-To: "Perry Jannette" <perry.jannette@usa.net>
>To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: OT: CCIE losing clout?
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:26:04 -0400
>
>While talking with a headhunter recently he made these comments.
>
>"I don't really work with CCIEs over #6000 cause they're only able to get
>about 85k cause companies know they don't have the experience. Companies
>aren't impressed by these 6 and 7 thousand numbers, they might as well send
>one of their CCNPs out. The 2000 and 3000 numbers are still well respected,
>with 4000 and 5000's falling in between."
>
>Anyone else heard these types of comments?
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:52 GMT-3