OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much.

From: Roche-Kelly, Edmund B. (Edmund.B.Roche-Kelly@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 11:55:02 GMT-3

• Next message: Michael E. Flannagan: "RE: Mobile IP/LAM"
• Previous message: Martin, Chris: "Re: show process cpu"
• Next in thread: Lee Waskevich: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Lee Waskevich: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Dennis Laganiere: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Martin, Chris: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Kris Foster: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Pinnacle -- Erik Freeland: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I have 255 unread emails and, well, isn't that neat?

I look at pots in the cupboard and think plain old telephone
service.

Add that to router configs invading dreams and I begin to wonder if
I'm losing it.

Ed
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Michael E. Flannagan: "RE: Mobile IP/LAM"
• Previous message: Martin, Chris: "Re: show process cpu"
• Next in thread: Lee Waskevich: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Lee Waskevich: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Dennis Laganiere: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Martin, Chris: "Re: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Kris Foster: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Maybe reply: Pinnacle -- Erik Freeland: "RE: OT: Signs you're getting into this a bit much."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:52 GMT-3