From: Padhu (LFG) (padhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 24 2001 - 00:04:17 GMT-3
without seeing te config ...not too much to say but do u have split horizon
enabled ?
Cheers,padhu
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Olson
To: Theodore TZEVELEKIS
Cc: Theodore TZEVELEKIS; Casassa, Nathan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 5/23/01 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
Forward your configs.
At 05:12 PM 5/23/2001, Theodore TZEVELEKIS wrote:
>ok... so I configured it... and now it advertises all /24, /25 and /26
>networks with a /26 mask :-( .....
>
>Result: I get routes looping around: router 1 advertises a /24 route
out to
>router 2, router 2 send it back with a /27 mask and router 1 enters it
in
>its routing table as a more specific route than its local one..... This
is
>crazy!
>
>I removed the secondaries and it works fine. I put them back, clear ip
route
>and here we go again.... this is ridiculous....
>
>Any ideas?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Theodore TZEVELEKIS [mailto:theodore_tzevelekis@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:12 PM
>To: Casassa, Nathan
>Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
>
>
>well not according to my routers :-)
>unless I'm doing something wrong......
>
>{trying again)
>
>well, u know something... you are both absolutely right....
>
>I don't know why it didn't accept it before but it does now: I just
tried it
>again. (probably getting late for me :-)
>I stand absolutely corrected!!!!! Thank you for insisting :-)
>
>Now, back to the issue:
>
>This is one solution that should work... though not very elegant. Any
other
>ideas? Something "cleaner"?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Casassa, Nathan [mailto:ncasassa@gnilink.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:59 PM
>To: 'Theodore TZEVELEKIS'
>Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
>
>
>What do you mean it only accepts one? Using the secondary command will
>allow as many secondary IP addys that the memory can handle according
to
>cisco.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Theodore TZEVELEKIS [mailto:theodore_tzevelekis@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:38 PM
>To: Michael E. Flannagan
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
>
>
>It only accepts one :-)
>I tried that already. The interface will only keep the last one you
>enter.... :-(
>
>(Besides, it would be an AWFUL waste of IP addresses.... Something that
our
>friend who needed more than a trillion address wouldn't appreciate :-)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael E. Flannagan [mailto:mflannag@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:07 PM
>To: Theodore TZEVELEKIS
>Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
>
>
>Why not configure multiple secondary addresses?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
> C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
> | | Network Consulting Engineer
> ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
> ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
>.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf
Of
> > Theodore TZEVELEKIS
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:48 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IGRP and VLSM
> >
> >
> > I have another - probably can't be done - scenario :-)
> >
> > 2 routers running IGRP.
> >
> > Router A: 1TR /26, 1 loopback /24
> > Router B: 1E /25
> > link between the two: /24
> >
> > How can you exchange all the networks between the two routers?
> >
> > With 2 types of masks, the solution I have found is to
> > configure secondary
> > address on the link with the adequate mask. But for 3....
> > can't think or
> > find anything.
> > Can it be done? Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Theo
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:51 GMT-3