From: hiler john (o_hiler@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 22:00:27 GMT-3
Hello Fred,
I think area-address 2 fffffffe should only work for
networks 2-3.so it doesn't mathc any ipx networks in
my test number, but i still got correct routing table,
included all four networks.
I forgot to metion that I already turned off the ipx
rip. So I think NLSP really automatically redistribute
connected network.
Hiler
Wednesday, May 23, 2001, 3:33:39 AM, you wrote:
FI> John: The area address command is used to
summarize the routes with
FI> route mask. area-address 2 fffffffe should work
for networks 20-2f.
FI> You bring up a good point as to "future
compataility". Did you check
FI> this out using area-address 444 fffffff0 on both
routers (or some other
FI> network that isn't configured)? My guess is that
it won't work. If you FI> haven't disabled RIP you
are probably getting the routes via RIP
FI> redistributed into NLSP over the WAN. For a
complete check you should
FI> disable RIP on all NLSP interfaces.
FI> NLSP does automatically redistribute IPX RIP but
not connected, or IPX
FI> EIGRP. I suspect you have the networks enabled
under rip (default) and
FI> are redistributing the routes to nlsp (also
default). If you want to
FI> test this - disable rip and sap on the ipxwan
serial link with ipx nlsp
FI> rip off and ipx nlsp sap off.
FI> Let me know if this isn't what you have.
FI> Cheers, Fred.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:51 GMT-3