From: Theodore TZEVELEKIS (theodore_tzevelekis@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 17:38:21 GMT-3
It only accepts one :-)
I tried that already. The interface will only keep the last one you
enter.... :-(
(Besides, it would be an AWFUL waste of IP addresses.... Something that our
friend who needed more than a trillion address wouldn't appreciate :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael E. Flannagan [mailto:mflannag@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:07 PM
To: Theodore TZEVELEKIS
Subject: RE: IGRP and VLSM
Why not configure multiple secondary addresses?
---------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
---------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Theodore TZEVELEKIS
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IGRP and VLSM
>
>
> I have another - probably can't be done - scenario :-)
>
> 2 routers running IGRP.
>
> Router A: 1TR /26, 1 loopback /24
> Router B: 1E /25
> link between the two: /24
>
> How can you exchange all the networks between the two routers?
>
> With 2 types of masks, the solution I have found is to
> configure secondary
> address on the link with the adequate mask. But for 3....
> can't think or
> find anything.
> Can it be done? Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Theo
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:50 GMT-3