From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 15:53:18 GMT-3
That would sorta defeat the purpose of shortest path first, now wouldn't it?
The RFC ( 2328 ) does specifically discuss load sharing requirements. Paths
must be equal cost in order to be load shared.
HTH
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shane Miles
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:25 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: OSPF unequal cost load balancing
My understanding is that when using OSPF you can have up to 4
equal-cost paths performing load balancing. Is it at all possible to do
unequal cost load balancing with OSPF as is possible with EIGRP?
-- Shane P. Miles **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:50 GMT-3