From: rsevier (rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 12:55:14 GMT-3
Remember the no sync rule. check the lab for which routers that you are not
to use the no sync on. the others are fair game.
Raymond
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ken Yeo
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:23 PM
To: stefan slad; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: lab 8a bootcamp- BGP problem
Hi Sladjan,
I experienced the same result. Once I have no sync in R6 or R1, I got > for
all iBGP routes.
I am still looking for good explaination in Halabi book for that behavior..
Ken Yeo
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
stefan slad
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:00 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: lab 8a bootcamp- BGP problem
I am have been working on lab 8a
Here is bgp problem :
When redistributing ospf in to bgp 2 , I have tryed to do redistribution
ospf->bgp only on r2
Could not get all ospf routes in bgp table of ibgp peers ( r6 and r1)
is it route-reflector client problem ? ( I do not know enough...)
So let me us r1 (not a rr client)
So I have used r1( for redis os100->bgp2)and results were better...still
Some ospf routes were in bgp table but without ">"
I checked solutions....
Marc redistributed ospf in to bgp 2 on r1 and r6 . My question is WHY?
I was told that one redistribution (ospf to bgp2) should be enough for
whole AS2.
Also I think that "no sync" should not be used at all ... Is there
someone who can comment
on "no sync" in this lab.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sladjan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:50 GMT-3