From: David Anderson (dma@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 14:03:25 GMT-3
If you wanted the users on the ethernet and tokenring interfaces on r1 to
be able to communicate with each other, you would have to configure SRTLB
right? If not, the suggestion below should work.
David
At 12:33 PM 5/22/2001 -0400, Choon, Raymond () wrote:
>Padhu,
>
>I second your solution. This is what I would do.
>
>Raymond
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Padhu (LFG) [mailto:padhu@steinroe.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:41 AM
>To: 'RAMIL'; Theodore TZEVELEKIS; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Cc: gorrior@yahoo.com
>Subject: RE: 2 dlsw peers. On both you have Ethernet and TR
>
>
>Just my 2c
>
>R1--------------R2
>ETh ETH
>TR TR
>On R1 and R2 , assign ip to ETH and TR interfaces and complete the dlsw
>configurations
>create a bridge group for ETh and Ring list for TR on both R1 and R2
>respectively.
>Create the remote peers on R1 with bgroup as the local target pointing to
>R2's ethernet as peer
>repeat this 3 more times for the 3 other interfaces.
>
>Somone correct me if this wouldn't work.
>
>Cheers,Padhu
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: RAMIL [mailto:ramil@SkiBuff.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:35 AM
>To: Theodore TZEVELEKIS; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Cc: gorrior@yahoo.com
>Subject: Re:
>
>
>border peers?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Theodore TZEVELEKIS" <theodore_tzevelekis@yahoo.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Cc: <gorrior@yahoo.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:28 AM
>
>
> > Suppose you have 2 dlsw peers. On both you have
> > Ethernet and TR.
> >
> > However, you only want the 2 ethernets to communicate
> > with eachother and the two TR with eachother.
> >
> > In other words, no TR traffic should be seen on either
> > ethernet and no ethernet traffic should be seen on
> > either TR.
> >
> > Any ideas about how to do this?
> >
> > Please reply to all.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:48 GMT-3