Re[2]: should all IBGP neighbours have all EBGP paths?

From: bernard.moreon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 07:14:32 GMT-3

• Next message: Darek Kuzma: "Re: More BGP from Halabi"
• Previous message: Theodore TZEVELEKIS: "RE: DLCI BACKUP - ANSWER"
• Maybe in reply to: Darren Hosking: "should all IBGP neighbours have all EBGP paths?"
• Next in thread: Darren Hosking: "RE: should all IBGP neighbours have all EBGP paths?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
On Halabi, you will find an explaination of that under :
     Configuring Effective Internet Routing Policies Chapter
          => Multihoming to a single provider section
               => Default, Primary, and backup, plus partial routing sub-sectio
n

     p373 on second edition, also available on first edition.

B.

• Next message: Darek Kuzma: "Re: More BGP from Halabi"
• Previous message: Theodore TZEVELEKIS: "RE: DLCI BACKUP - ANSWER"
• Maybe in reply to: Darren Hosking: "should all IBGP neighbours have all EBGP paths?"
• Next in thread: Darren Hosking: "RE: should all IBGP neighbours have all EBGP paths?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:47 GMT-3