From: cao lingwei (caolw@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 00:16:48 GMT-3
i have not used the command:
dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive
in r1 & r2,
but i was told that the question is wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
To: <caolw@fosco.com.cn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
>
> Cao, that should work fine. I just tested it.
>
> Don't forget to use: dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive on R2 and R1, or otherwise
> R3 will send explorers for other mac addresses.
>
> And you might also want to use: dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive remote on R2
> and R1, or otherwise R1 and R2 will not pass any traffic from the local
> segement with the source mac address other than specified in "dlsw icanreach
> mac-addr" statement.
>
>
> >From: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> >Reply-To: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> >To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
> >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:31:18 +0800
> >
> >wrong that it doesn't work with "icanreach" on R2 and R1.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> >To: <caolw@fosco.com.cn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:27 AM
> >Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
> >
> >
> > >
> > > you mean
> > >
> > > 1. wrong that you HAVE TO do it on R3?
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > 2. wrong that it doesn't work with "icanreach" on R2 and R1?
> > >
> > > >From: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> > > >To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
> > > >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:26:12 +0800
> > > >
> > > >I do this the same way,but wrong...
> > > >any other ways?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> > > >To: <caolw@fosco.com.cn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:11 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > you mean configure r3 (not r5)?
> > > > >
> > > > > I've never known a way of configuring static mac-address routes
> >using
> > > >masks.
> > > > > I mean you can do this on R3:
> > > > >
> > > > > dlsw mac-addr 4000.1000.0001 remote-peer ip-address 1.1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > But it looks like you want to do it for 4000.1000.XXXX, I would then
> > > >create
> > > > > icanreach statements on R2 and R1
> > > > >
> > > > > dlsw icanreach 4000.1000.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, I don't think there is a way to do this on R3. Anyone, ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> > > > > >Reply-To: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> > > > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > >Subject: about Dlsw+ explorer
> > > > > >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:33:23 +0800
> > > > > >
> > > > > >A question:
> > > > > > r3----(fr)----R2---|(vlan_1)
> > > > > > |----R1---|(vlan_1)
> > > > > >R3 connect with r1&r2 use frame
> > > > > >R3 is hub,r1&r2 are spokes
> > > > > >
> > > > > >r3 estabilish a peer with r2
> > > > > >r3 estabilish a backpeer with r1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >R1&R2's vlan have some mac addresses:4000.1000.xxxx
> > > > > >
> > > > > >config r5 connect with these mac address withour
> > > > > >send explorer packets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thanks
> > > > > >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:47 GMT-3