From: cao lingwei (caolw@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 23:26:12 GMT-3
I do this the same way,but wrong...
any other ways?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
To: <caolw@fosco.com.cn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: about Dlsw+ explorer
>
> you mean configure r3 (not r5)?
>
> I've never known a way of configuring static mac-address routes using masks.
> I mean you can do this on R3:
>
> dlsw mac-addr 4000.1000.0001 remote-peer ip-address 1.1.1.1
>
> But it looks like you want to do it for 4000.1000.XXXX, I would then create
> icanreach statements on R2 and R1
>
> dlsw icanreach 4000.1000.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000
>
> Again, I don't think there is a way to do this on R3. Anyone, ideas?
>
>
> >From: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> >Reply-To: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: about Dlsw+ explorer
> >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:33:23 +0800
> >
> >A question:
> > r3----(fr)----R2---|(vlan_1)
> > |----R1---|(vlan_1)
> >R3 connect with r1&r2 use frame
> >R3 is hub,r1&r2 are spokes
> >
> >r3 estabilish a peer with r2
> >r3 estabilish a backpeer with r1
> >
> >R1&R2's vlan have some mac addresses:4000.1000.xxxx
> >
> >config r5 connect with these mac address withour
> >send explorer packets.
> >
> >Thanks
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:47 GMT-3