From: Ken Yeo (kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 19:53:48 GMT-3
Hi Raymond,
I though about this too. I redistribute OSPF into BGP only on R1 in the
beginning. R8 didn't receive all AS2 routes.
I do a show ip bgp in R6, the routes that didn't advertise across R6--> R8
have not > (best routes) on them.
I have to redistribute OSPF into BGP on R6 to make it work. Below is my SHOW
IP BGP on R6 after redistribute OSPF into BGP on R1 and R6.
r6#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 271, local router ID is 137.20.60.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 137.20.10.0/24 137.20.64.5 20 32768 ?
* i137.20.20.0/24 137.20.25.2 129 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 71 32768 ?
* i137.20.25.0/24 137.20.25.1 0 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 70 32768 ?
* i137.20.30.0/24 137.20.25.2 129 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 71 32768 ?
* i137.20.33.0/24 137.20.25.2 129 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 71 32768 ?
* i137.20.40.16/28 137.20.25.2 164 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 106 32768 ?
*>i137.20.60.0/24 137.20.25.2 71 100 0 ?
*>i137.20.64.0/20 137.20.25.2 70 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.81.0/24 137.20.86.1 0 0 1 i
*> 137.20.82.0/24 137.20.86.1 0 0 1 i
* i137.20.100.33/32 137.20.25.2 128 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 70 32768 ?
* i137.20.100.34/32 137.20.25.2 64 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 6 32768 ?
* i137.20.100.35/32 137.20.25.2 128 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 70 32768 ?
* i137.20.200.16/28 137.20.25.2 164 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 106 32768 ?
* i137.20.240.0/20 137.20.25.2 65 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 7 32768 ?
* i160.0.0.0/4 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i
*> 137.20.64.5 1 32768 ?
* i160.10.10.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i
* i161.10.10.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i
* i170.10.10.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i
* i172.168.70.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i
*> 172.168.80.0/24 137.20.86.1 0 0 1 i
* i200.200.100.0 137.20.25.2 129 100 0 ?
*> 137.20.64.5 71 32768 ?
*> 200.200.200.0 137.20.64.5 71 32768 ?
-----Original Message-----
From: rsevier [mailto:rsevier@zealousolutions.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Roman Rodichev; kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
I agree that bgp always-compare-med is not needed. however, I have another
one for you. Does there need to be redistribution on r1 of ospf into bgp.
I know that redistribution of bgp into ospf is needed. I have just
completed 8a and didn't find a reason to for the redistribution on r1 of
ospf into bgp. Our solution worked fine with out it because of the it is
being redistributed on r6. Can I get any input as to why it is in the
answers from Marc.
thanks in advance
Raymond
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Roman Rodichev
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31 PM
To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
I thought so too
>From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
>Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 01:06:44 -0500
>
>on r1
>
>I believe bgp always-compare-med is not needed.
>
>Anyone can comfirm that?
>
>Thanks!
>Ken Yeo
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:47 GMT-3