From: rsevier (rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 13:30:07 GMT-3
I agree that bgp always-compare-med is not needed. however, I have another
one for you. Does there need to be redistribution on r1 of ospf into bgp.
I know that redistribution of bgp into ospf is needed. I have just
completed 8a and didn't find a reason to for the redistribution on r1 of
ospf into bgp. Our solution worked fine with out it because of the it is
being redistributed on r6. Can I get any input as to why it is in the
answers from Marc.
thanks in advance
Raymond
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Roman Rodichev
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31 PM
To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
I thought so too
>From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
>Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 01:06:44 -0500
>
>on r1
>
>I believe bgp always-compare-med is not needed.
>
>Anyone can comfirm that?
>
>Thanks!
>Ken Yeo
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:46 GMT-3