From: Ravi (s_ravichandran@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 02:07:59 GMT-3
Hi,
I have done that lab and I know policy routing was only the solution, but
still trying to get more information. I appreciate John's input on this lab.
John, please ignore the people who passes dirty comments. We are not here to
make such a dirty comment. Even if John has made a mistake, it is nothing to
do with CCIE. What if John has made that mistake? anybody could make
mistake. One can point out the mistake that is all.
Ravi Chandran
MCSE/CCDP/CCNP & Voice Specialist
Tel: 416 289 7411
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Kaberna" <jkaberna@netcginc.com>
To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>; <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> If you don't want to listen to me and the couple others that have
responded
> good luck getting out of Day 1. But, you are certainly no one to question
> my knowledge and my qualification. So back up a step. Go do your
reading.
> Then come back and give me my apology.
>
> If you actually bother to read Lab 1 you will see that Step 11 says solve
> the problem with routing not layer 3 to layer 2 mapping. Hence the policy
> routing. You clearly don't have lab 1 and the answers in front of you nor
> do you understand fundamental concepts of OSPF and frame relay.
>
> John Kaberna
> CCIE #7146
> NETCG Inc
> www.netcginc.com
> (415) 750-3800
> Fax: 750-3900
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> To: <jkaberna@netcginc.com>; <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 9:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>
>
> > John, you are ccie, aren't you? No offense, but this is like the basics
of
> > OSPF.
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/3.html#11.2.1
> >
> > "OSPF point-to-multipoint works by exchanging additional link-state
> updates
> > that contain a number of information elements that describe connectivity
> to
> > the neighboring routers."
> >
> > or here is the quote from the Q&A forum on TAC:
> >
> > "Configuring nonbroadcast multiaccess networks as either broadcast
> > or non-broadcast assumes that there are virtual circuits from every
> > router to every router or fully meshed network. This is not true for
> > cases where you have cost constraints or when you have only a partially
> > meshed network. In these cases, you can configure the OSPF network type
> > as a point-to-multipoint network. Routing between two routers that are
> > not directly connected will occur through a router that has virtual
> > circuits to the routers that are not directly connected."
> >
> > Try using "ip ospf network broadcast" and then "ip ospf network
> > point-to-multipoint", and notice the /32 routes. This command is not
just
> > about timers. Can some one back me up?
> >
> >
> > >From: "John Kaberna" <jkaberna@netcginc.com>
> > >To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>, <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>,
> > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 20:48:59 -0700
> > >
> > >Sorry Roman but your wrong. The ip ospf network command only sets the
> > >timers. Go look it up.
> > >
> > >John Kaberna
> > >CCIE #7146
> > >NETCG Inc
> > >www.netcginc.com
> > >(415) 750-3800
> > >Fax: 750-3900
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> > >To: <jkaberna@netcginc.com>; <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>;
> > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:38 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > >
> > >
> > > > I think Step 8 (cant use ip ospf network) is solved by policy
routing.
> > > >
> > > > Frame maps are not needed for the routing to work, "ip ospf network"
> > >would
> > > > do frame map's job.
> > > >
> > > > >From: "John Kaberna" <jkaberna@netcginc.com>
> > > > >To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>,
<Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>,
> > > > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 20:27:46 -0700
> > > > >
> > > > >I think you are getting step 8 and step 11 confused.
> > > > >
> > > > >Step 8 (cant used ip ospf network) - solved by used ip ospf
> > >hello-interval
> > > > >
> > > > >Step 11 (cant use 2 frame maps on the spokes) - solved by using
> policy
> > > > >routing
> > > > >
> > > > >John Kaberna
> > > > >CCIE #7146
> > > > >NETCG Inc
> > > > >www.netcginc.com
> > > > >(415) 750-3800
> > > > >Fax: 750-3900
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> > > > >To: <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > >Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:51 PM
> > > > >Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > People, am I being stupid? I will take a look at that lab on
> > >Tuesday.
> > >I
> > > > > > clearly remember that they explicitly said not to use "ip ospf
> > >network"
> > > > > > statement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, you guys are right that we weren't allowed to use "frame
map"
> > > > > > statements on the spokes. And it's ok. That was not the point of
> the
> > > > >lab.
> > > > > > The point was that we couldn't use "ip ospf network multipoint"
> > > > >statement,
> > > > > > which would fix the entire scenario by creating /32 routes on
the
> > >spokes
> > > > > > pointing to the hub. So since we couldn't do it, we had to
create
> > >policy
> > > > > > routing that would send traffic to the hub manually.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am I right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >From: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> > > > > > >Reply-To: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
> > > > > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > >Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > > > > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:40:14 +0100
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Hi Roman
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >My understanding of Lab1 was that you policy route as you are
not
> > > > >permitted
> > > > > > >to add multiple frame relay map statements from spoke to spoke,
> you
> > > > >policy
> > > > > > >route so that the next hop is actually your hub ( when
attempting
> > >to
> > > > >reach
> > > > > > >a
> > > > > > >spoke from a spoke )the hub is obviously aware of all spokes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
> > > > > > >Sent: 19 May 2001 21:13
> > > > > > >To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Ken, policy routing should be used when you can't achieve
certain
> > >task
> > > > >with
> > > > > > >the routing protocol you have or WAN technology you are using.
> And
> > >of
> > > > > > >course, when you are asked to use it. Let's say you have
> multipoint
> > > > > > >frame-relay, and you can't use "ip ospf network" statement. The
> > >only
> > > > >way
> > > > >to
> > > > > > >achieve routing between FR spokes is to use policy-routing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >by the way, this is from Lab1 of ccbootcamp, so I'm not
violating
> > >NDA.
> > > > >NDA
> > > > > > >is f...ing scary nowadays
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > > > > > > >Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> > > > > > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > > > >Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> > > > > > > >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:59:50 -0500
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Is policy routing allowed for the lab?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The reason I ask is because policy routing essentially bypass
> > >routing
> > > > > > >table
> > > > > > > >and it behave like static route, only it depends on source
> > >address
> > > > > > >instead
> > > > > > > >of destination address.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Policy routing can solve a lot of problem, especially
> > >redistributing
> > > > >VLSM
> > > > > > > >OSPF routes into IGRP with same major network.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >What is your thought?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Ken Yeo
> > > > > > > >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:46 GMT-3