From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 15:07:28 GMT-3
Curtis: SAPs will not be broadcast out the interface they are learned
on. As an example, configure static SAPs and, with default routes,
point the static SAP network to different interfaces on the router. You
will see the static SAPs advertised out the IPX enabled interfaces
except the interface in the default route.
Example: you have two Ethernet interfaces e0 with IPX network 10 and e1
with IPX network 20. Define two static SAPs:
ipx sap 04 Zero aaa.0.0.1 451 2
ipx sap 04 One bbb.0.0.1 451 2
Define two default routes, ipx route aaa 10.0000.1234.5678
ipx route bbb 20.0000.5678.9abc
You will see Zero advertised on e1 and One advertised on e 0.
HTH, Fred.
Curtis Call wrote:
>
> I noticed something that I don't remember seeing mentioned anywhere in the
> documentation. Am I correct that IPX SAP propagation flows away from the
> supposed sender? I assumed that a router treated RIP and SAP the same, it
> just broadcasted all it's known routes and SAPS at set times out all RIP
> enabled interfaces (keeping split horizon rules in mind) but in the lab I
> am working on right now I've noticed that the router will suppress SAP
> updates that flow towards the source, according to the routing table.
> Is this standard behavior or am I just seeing things? I guess it follows
> the same behavior as type-20 propagation, correct?
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:45 GMT-3