Re: ATM question

From: Carlos Gonzales (carlos@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 19:03:04 GMT-3

• Next message: Justin Menga: "RE: Using Public Addresses Internally"
• Previous message: John Huston: "RE: IPSEC and Tunneling"
• Maybe in reply to: sanjay: "ATM question"
• Next in thread: Andrew Lennon: "RE: ATM question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I would say Layer 2 based on the implementation I have seen. However, you
can use it at Layer 3
but it has a really complex addressing scheme that goes over the head of
most ops technician.

My 0.02,
-Carlos

----- Original Message -----
From: "sanjay" <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: ATM question

> Is ATM a layer 2 technolgy or layer 3 ?
>
> thanks,
> Sanjay
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Justin Menga: "RE: Using Public Addresses Internally"
• Previous message: John Huston: "RE: IPSEC and Tunneling"
• Maybe in reply to: sanjay: "ATM question"
• Next in thread: Andrew Lennon: "RE: ATM question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:44 GMT-3