From: Bob Dixon (bobdixon@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 12:12:00 GMT-3
I am kinda young in the industry, so maybe I should keep my mouth shut. But,
I would be concerned about this from a liability perspective. Let's say that
something happened and you did accidentally allow routing to leak into the
global internet. You would be blackholing someone, heaven forbid, an
ecommerce site or another money-making site. I wonder if your company could
be help liable and be forced to pay damages for this inconvenience. Maybe
someone out there has heard of this happening???
Just a thought...
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: McCallum, Robert <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
To: 'Bruce Williams' <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>;
<andrew.2.shore@bt.com>; <David.Halaska@getronics.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
> Bruce,
>
> Whatever address space you use on your internal network is entirely up to
> you. All you have to do is make sure that when connecting to the outside
> world that you bolt it down well enough, which every company does anyway
> when accessing the internet (at least they should).
>
> At the end of the day it is up to you...Use the whole address range if you
> need to.
>
> Cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> Sent: 17 May 2001 15:31
> To: andrew.2.shore@bt.com; David.Halaska@getronics.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
>
>
> I need enough addresses to accommodate hundreds of customers, each will
need
> hundred or so different networks and in these networks they will have over
a
> hundred hosts. I might be able to accommodate that by subnetting 10.0.0.0
> and then if necessary subnetting 172.16.0.0 and then 192.168.0.0, but my
> boss believes it will be easier to use Class A space 1.0.0.0 to 126.0.0.0
> that way they can have a cookie cutter method of assigning IP addresses.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <andrew.2.shore@bt.com>
> To: <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>; <David.Halaska@getronics.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:20 AM
> Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
>
>
> > ?????? ever thought of subnetting ?
> >
> >
> > Andrew Shore
> > BTcd
> > IDC Technical Specialist
> > > ignite Content Hosting
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > Sent: 17 May 2001 15:12
> > To: Halaska, David; ccielab
> > Subject: Re: Using Public Addresses Internally
> >
> >
> > We need much more address space than that.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Halaska, David" <David.Halaska@getronics.com>
> > To: "'Bruce Williams'" <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:16 AM
> > Subject: RE: Using Public Addresses Internally
> >
> >
> > > Could you use the 10.x.x.x class A range that is reserved for private
> use?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:56 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Using Public Addresses Internally
> > >
> > >
> > > My company wants to use public addresses from the Class A range
> > internally.
> > > I
> > > realize the danger if these routes got advertised on the Internet, but
> is
> > > this
> > > something that is considered acceptable if it is carefully done to
> prevent
> > > the
> > > risk of these routes being propagated out on the Public Internet?
These
> > > networks will be used to address equipment in a multitude of cellular
> > radio
> > > base stations around the country and they will only be connected to
our
> > > network. There will central locations where users from the internet
> could
> > > access a database which will query these systems, but there will not
be
> a
> > > direct internet connection. I would appreciate any advice on this.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bruce Williams
> > > 215-275-2723
> > > bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:43 GMT-3