From: Jay Hennigan (jay@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 16:15:48 GMT-3
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Roderick Ta wrote:
> Sometimes, a single question that actual exists in the real exam lab
> can be considered incidental. But if you pose a number of questions,
> and the people from CCIE program monitoring this list considered they
> were from the real lab questions, then you would be considered violate
> NDA, and be punished.
>
> This list is monitored. There was a clarification recently posted by
> Enid Sorkowitz, Manager, Customer Service, CCIE Program.
>
> Roderick Ta
OK, but consider what the proper reaction of those on the list should be.
Suppose I'm a CCIE candidate, and I know to study the basic core stuff.
Person A on the list posts an obscure question relating to a specific
scenario and gets a response helping to explain, which generates a thread
of hints and pitfalls.
Person B posts an obscure question relating to a diffferent specific
scenario, and half a dozen people who have been to the lab scream "NDA".
Which of the two hypotheticals is more likely to be on the real lab?
And who is is that *really* violated NDA by giving away the obvious clue
that a specific scenario was a test question? The one who asked (who may
never have seen an actual lab) or the half dozen who have indeed seen the
lab and flamed by pointing out "NDA"?
Wouldn't it be better for those "in the know" to simply ignore the obvious
test question, or to answer it generically the same as any other hypothetical?
-- Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - jay@west.net NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/ WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323 **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:41 GMT-3