From: Mas Kato (tealp729@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 13 2001 - 07:21:23 GMT-3
<<on the bright side though it is making me have to prove my knowledge>>
I couldn't agree more. Taking what I read with a grain of salt and
validating it for myself has caused me to re-think many old habits--I've
eaten humble pie on more than one occasion!
Mas
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Virnoche, Phil
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:30 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Satterlee and Hutnick CCIE Practice lab kit - DLSW and Bridging
Group-
Has anyone else done this one? I COMPLETELY disagree with the
configuration
for R5 and R1. Reference pages 366-367. I do not see any need for a
source-bridge ring-group statement on DLSW peers that are only hosting
ethernet segments. Isn't that what the beauty of DLSW+? .... terminating
the
ring at the peer.... unlike RSRB?
Unless someone can explain why, I am calling BULLSHIT on these authors
again
! (excuse my french)... This book is SOOOOO full of errors.... on the
bright
side though it is making me have to prove my knowledge ( or lack there
of
)....
Any thoughts????
Philip G. Virnoche
Sr. Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
phone: 425.580.5239
cell: 206.601.3134
"HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
pig."
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:40 GMT-3