From: forlab (forccielab@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 23:09:40 GMT-3
See the attatach file , it's from a Cisco internal .
DLSW.ppt
Good Luck
2001/05/11 16:05:06, xander <xander@adt.ru> wrote:
>Hello JAY,
>
>Sometimes Cisco uses revulsive statements in their questions.
>1. If you are asked about only test frames use ACL 200 deny 0x0000
>0x00D0; ACL 200 permit 0x0000 0x0D0D
>because tesf frames - ARE and STE have destination ZERO.
>
>2. If you are asked about particular MAC address, better think about
>less complex statements, for example about ICAN(NOT)REACH commands.
>
>3. If that does not fit to your requirements, use access-expressions
>with ACL 200 and ACL 700 and may be with NETBIOS ACLs.
>
>
>J> Group,
>
>J> Here's the scenario:
>
>J> r1--------r2: restrict explorer packets with the mac
4000.0002.xxxx from
>J> reaching r2. Host still should be able to send data to those mac
addresses.
>
>J> How can I do this effectively?
>
>J> TIA
>
>J> JAY
>
>--
> WBW, xander
> mailto:xander@adt.ru
> CCNA, CCNP+VoiceAccess,
> CCIE second attempt in Brussels
> 9-10, July, 2001
>
>...
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of dls
w_SAP_filter.gif]
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:40 GMT-3