From: Devender Singh (devender.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 04:54:27 GMT-3
Tariq,
It is an interesting problem. This is what I think. We will peer between r1
and r2. then we put r2-r3 wan interface int a brigde which can be covered by
dlsw bridge command. If there are more interfaces on r3 they will need to be
bridged. Basically include everything attached to right handside of R2 in
one single bridge.
Is your solution is similar to this. As you said without having couple of
PCs its hard to test.
best regards
Devender Singh
BE(Hons), CCNP
IP Solution Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: Tariq Sharif [mailto:tariq_sharif@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2001 6:09
To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: DLSw+ "Inverse ARP"??
Practice lab asks for providing full DLSw+ connectivity between R2 & R3.And
between the ring & Lan1 & 2 but by only using ONE peer statement at R1
can't use border peers or promis)
ring--R1---WAN---R2--WAN--R3
| |
| LAN1 LAN2
Is there anything like Inverse ARP in DLSw+? So if I do a single DLS
remote peer statement on R1 with R2 as remote peer, will this provide R3
connectivity between R1 & R3? I've got it setup like this but don't know
how to see if it works (don't have PCs etc)
Many thanks & regards.
Tariq Sharif
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:38 GMT-3