RE: DLSW+ explorer

From: Lachlan Kidd (lkidd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 03:18:39 GMT-3

• Next message: fwells12: "Re: DLSW+ explorer"
• Previous message: JAY: "DLSW+ explorer"
• Maybe in reply to: JAY: "DLSW+ explorer"
• Next in thread: fwells12: "Re: DLSW+ explorer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi Jay,
        If you use a dlsw icanreach macaddress 4000.0002.0000 mask ffff.ffff.00
00
at the remote end, R1 will not need to send explorers to find these mac
addresses. The reachability cache will be populated during capabilites
exchange.
That's how I think it works. Does anyone want to correct me ?
Lachlan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
JAY
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 4:12:PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW+ explorer

Group,

Here's the scenario:

r1--------r2: restrict explorer packets with the mac 4000.0002.xxxx from
reaching r2. Host still should be able to send data to those mac addresses.

How can I do this effectively?

TIA

JAY
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: fwells12: "Re: DLSW+ explorer"
• Previous message: JAY: "DLSW+ explorer"
• Maybe in reply to: JAY: "DLSW+ explorer"
• Next in thread: fwells12: "Re: DLSW+ explorer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:38 GMT-3