From: Paul Crist (pcrist@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 20:32:58 GMT-3
I have it working now. I had to use the area range command at the abr, as I
thought. What I did not know was that if I use a summary-address command at
the asbr's that will create an entry in the routing table going to null0,
for ospf areas that are connected to that router. Then I have a route entry
with the network mask that will allow the router to be redistributed into
igrp.
Thanks for all of the suggestions,
Paul Crist
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
To: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: FatKid 501
> Can you post your config for the asbr in area 2? Is this router actually
an
> asbr or is it an abr? I would also like to see the routing table of the
> ASBR in ARea0 if possible.
>
> Johnny Dedon
> Senior Staff Consultant
> Exodus Professional Services
> johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> www.exodus.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
> To: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 PM
> Subject: Re: FatKid 501
>
>
> > I had one at the asbr in area 2 and it does not sho a summary in area 0.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
> > To: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
> > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 5:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: FatKid 501
> >
> >
> > > Paul,
> > > You can not create the area range inside of area 0 and see it in area
0.
> > It
> > > needs to be advertised into area 0. Try using the area range command
in
> > > area 2 to summarize an area 2 route and then go look at the routing
> table
> > of
> > > a router in area 0.
> > >
> > > Johnny Dedon
> > > Senior Staff Consultant
> > > Exodus Professional Services
> > > johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> > > www.exodus.net
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
> > > To: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
> > > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: FatKid 501
> > >
> > >
> > > > Originally I was working with just the area ranges, the summary
> address
> > > got
> > > > into the config when I was trying anything to get it to work. Here
is
> > the
> > > > router ospf from the abr and the sho ip route, as you can see I
don't
> > get
> > > a
> > > > summary for the 170.10.1.0 network.
> > > >
> > > > router ospf 200
> > > > area 0 range 170.10.1.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > area 2 virtual-link 170.10.4.4
> > > > network 170.10.1.18 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > > network 170.10.1.35 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > > network 170.10.2.5 0.0.0.0 area 2
> > > > network 170.10.3.5 0.0.0.0 area 2
> > > >
> > > > 170.10.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 4 masks
> > > > O E2 170.10.32.0/24 [110/158350] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:02,
> Ethernet0
> > > > O E2 170.10.33.0/24 [110/20] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:02, Ethernet0
> > > > C 170.10.1.32/28 is directly connected, Serial0.103
> > > > O IA 170.10.4.4/32 [110/11] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:02, Ethernet0
> > > > O 170.10.1.0/28 [110/128] via 170.10.1.17, 00:06:02,
Serial0.102
> > > > [110/128] via 170.10.1.33, 00:06:02,
Serial0.103
> > > > O IA 170.10.2.0/24 [110/20] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:02, Ethernet0
> > > > C 170.10.2.0/26 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> > > > C 170.10.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > > O E2 170.10.4.0/24 [110/158350] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:02,
Ethernet0
> > > > O E2 170.10.16.0/24 [110/158350] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:03,
> Ethernet0
> > > > O E2 170.10.17.0/24 [110/158350] via 170.10.2.4, 00:06:03,
> Ethernet0
> > > > C 170.10.1.16/28 is directly connected, Serial0.102
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
> > > > To: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:26 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: FatKid 501
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Paul,
> > > > > I haven't looked at this lab, but I think you problem is related
to
> > one
> > > of
> > > > > two things. First, the summary address command is used to
summarize
> > > > > external routes being redistributed into ospf. Second, the area
> range
> > > > > command summarizes routes to be advertised to other ospf areas.
You
> > > should
> > > > > look to summarize the route before it gets to area 0 where it
looks
> > like
> > > > > your redistribution is occurring. Can you summarize it in Area2
> using
> > > the
> > > > > area-range command? If so the summary will show up in area 0
where
> > you
> > > > can
> > > > > redistribute into igrp.
> > > > >
> > > > > HTH
> > > > > Johnny Dedon
> > > > > Senior Staff Consultant
> > > > > Exodus Professional Services
> > > > > johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> > > > > www.exodus.net
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Paul Crist" <pcrist@netsync.net>
> > > > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:04 PM
> > > > > Subject: FatKid 501
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am doing the fatkid 501 lab and I can't get a network to
> summarize
> > > and
> > > > > > redistribute into IGRP. Instead of using multipoint on the
frame
> > > relay
> > > > > > network I used point to point sub interfaces. When I attempt to
> do
> > an
> > > > > summary
> > > > > > address at the redistribution router it does not work. My IP
> > address
> > > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > frame relay are all subnets of the same class C address which I
am
> > > > trying
> > > > > to
> > > > > > do a summary address for. Here is the router ospf and igrp from
> the
> > > > > > redistribution router. The 170.10.1.0 network is the problem
> child.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > router ospf 200
> > > > > > area 0 range 170.10.1.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > area 2 range 170.10.2.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > area 2 virtual-link 170.10.3.5
> > > > > > summary-address 170.10.1.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > summary-address 170.10.2.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > > > redistribute rip subnets
> > > > > > redistribute igrp 200 subnets
> > > > > > network 170.10.2.4 0.0.0.0 area 2
> > > > > > network 170.10.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > router igrp 200
> > > > > > redistribute ospf 200
> > > > > > redistribute rip metric 1 255 1 1 1
> > > > > > passive-interface Ethernet0
> > > > > > passive-interface Loopback0
> > > > > > passive-interface Serial1
> > > > > > passive-interface TokenRing0
> > > > > > network 170.10.0.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Show ip route from the redistribution router:
> > > > > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 170.10.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 11 subnets, 4 masks
> > > > > > C 170.10.32.0/24 is directly connected, TokenRing0
> > > > > > R 170.10.33.0/24 [120/1] via 170.10.32.3, 00:00:10,
> TokenRing0
> > > > > > O 170.10.1.32/28 [110/74] via 170.10.2.5, 01:06:40,
> Ethernet0
> > > > > > O 170.10.1.0/28 [110/138] via 170.10.2.5, 01:06:40,
> Ethernet0
> > > > > > O 170.10.2.0/24 is a summary, 01:06:34, Null0
> > > > > > C 170.10.2.0/26 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> > > > > > O IA 170.10.3.0/24 [110/11] via 170.10.2.5, 01:06:40,
Ethernet0
> > > > > > C 170.10.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > > > > O 170.10.3.5/32 [110/11] via 170.10.2.5, 01:06:40,
Ethernet0
> > > > > > C 170.10.16.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
> > > > > > O 170.10.1.16/28 [110/74] via 170.10.2.5, 01:06:40,
> Ethernet0
> > > > > > C 192.19.15.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sho ip route from the router in IGRP
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 170.10.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> > > > > > I 170.10.32.0 [100/158313] via 170.10.16.4, 00:00:21,
> Serial4
> > > > > > I 170.10.33.0 [100/10002255] via 170.10.16.4, 00:00:21,
> > Serial4
> > > > > > I 170.10.4.0 [100/158750] via 170.10.16.4, 00:00:21, Seria
l4
> > > > > > C 170.10.16.0 is directly connected, Serial4
> > > > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:36 GMT-3