From: Pickell, Aaryn (Aaryn.Pickell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 18:44:58 GMT-3
I believe that the peers will send that information across anyway during
capabilities exchange, so it shouldn't be necessary. I'm not 100% certain
of that, though. So, if I'm wrong, I'd be interested in discusing it with
people who can tell me why.
Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
Getronics Inc.
Direct: 713-394-1609
Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
this message and attachments. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sanjay [mailto:ccienxtyear@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW Question
>
>
> Is it required (or should I say necessary) to define the
> largest frame size on
> the remote peer statement when going from Token Ring to Ethernet e.g
>
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 170.100.42.241 lf 1500 lsap-output-list 200
>
> thanks,
> Sanjay
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:36 GMT-3