From: Dan (dp595@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 14:06:02 GMT-3
This is correct. A /24 from Class C space has a better chance of being
propagated than a /24 from A or B space.
This is Verio's policy which is similar to the policy of "many" other ISPs:
Outbound Announcements:
We will not announce any prefix larger than /24 (regardless of whether it's
A, B, or C space) to our Peers.
Inbound Announcement from our Peers (this does not apply to "Customer"
Peerings):
a.. We accept /20 and shorter in the 24/8, 61/8, 62/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8,
and 66/8 address space.
b.. In the traditional Class A space (i.e., 0/1), we accept /19 and
shorter, with the exceptions specified above.
c.. In the traditional Class B space (i.e., 128/2), we accept /16 and
shorter.
d.. In the traditional Class C space (i.e., 192/3), we accept /24 and
shorter.
While we will allow BGP customer's to announce "any" prefix /24 or shorter,
other ISPs may filter these announcements and not listen to them, the same
way that we will not listen to certain announcements that do not comply with
our above policy.
I always warn my customer of this when setting up peering sessions. Some
tell me that they have no problems routing a /22 from Class B space, but I
always forewarn them.
Please don't ask me why (I don't entirely agree with all of it myself).
-Dan Pontrelli
> Cisco told me today that a /24 drawn from Class C space
> has a better chance of being propogated throughout the Internet
> than a /24 taken from Class B space. Anyone disagree with that?
> Can anyone recommend a good source of info on this. Ive checked
> Halabi.
>
> I came across a good reference during my quest www.traceroute.org
> Unfortunately, it doesnt offer plain answers to my questions.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gb@ms.mine.nu [mailto:gb@ms.mine.nu]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:58 PM
> To: Charlie Winckless; 'Murphy, Brennan'
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: real world BGP question
>
>
> Currently on a US basis a /24 would generaly work. Internationaly
(Europe)
> most providers would filter out anywhing longer then /20.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charlie Winckless" <CharlieW@netarch.com>
> To: "'Murphy, Brennan'" <Brennan_Murphy@nai.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:18 PM
> Subject: RE: real world BGP question
>
>
> > I used to work for VERIO. At that time they would not
> > router smaller than /19 on their backbone.
> >
> > This may have changed.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Murphy, Brennan [mailto:Brennan_Murphy@nai.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:46 AM
> > > To: 'Michelle T'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > Subject: RE: real world BGP question
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess that is my real question: what is the longest prefix that
> > > is exchanged among/between major carriers.
> > >
> > > The real world example here is what if you had 4 server farms
> > > answering
> > > to one DNS name: ftp.foo.com You have Round Robin DNS running
> > > round trip times to match a user with their nearest server farm....
> > > so it sends back the closest/fastest IP. The question is, how
> > > big do those
> > > subnets for the server farms have to be in order to be maximally
> > > advertised throughout the internet?
> > >
> > > So, I've seen two answers in this thread /20-21 or /24. I wonder
> > > where I could find the real answer? Maybe Halabi has a link in the
> > > back of his book to an organization that maintains info such as
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Any more input is greatly appreciated. Thanks to all who have
> > > responded.
> > > I figured this question was a relavant BGP question relating
> > > our studies
> > > to an actual scenario.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michelle T [mailto:mtruman@mn.mediaone.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:06 PM
> > > To: Murphy, Brennan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: real world BGP question
> > >
> > >
> > > /24 is the longest prefix you will see accepted by nearly any
> > > carrier out
> > > there. Many will only accept /20 or /21. All perform
> > > aggregation to some
> > > degree, though exception routing is allowed to send the /24's
> > > (/23, /22,
> > > etc) out to the ISP peers when the customer is multi-homed two diverse
> > > carriers.
> > >
> > > I can tell you that I work for a Tier 1 ISP and we accept
> > > longer prefixes
> > > for many customers who are multi-homed just to us. They use
> > > the various
> > > subnets as a simple method of controlling inbound traffic
> > > distribution, to
> > > enact policy, etc...
> > >
> > > Many times we see multi-homed (dual-ISP) customers advertise
> > > an aggregate
> > > /16 or longer and also advertise /24's for the same reaason (policy,
> > > distribution, etc).
> > >
> > > Michelle Truman
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Murphy, Brennan
> > > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:28 AM
> > > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > Subject: real world BGP question
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the smallest subnet that major carriers will exchange with one
> > > another? /24..../26.../27?? I know that the real issue is
> > > the size of
> > > the route table.
> > >
> > > I'm just wondering about the reallity of scenarios that
> > > Habali describes
> > > where an institution advertises an aggregate with specific subnets.
> > >
> > > I know that when you're multi-homed to a carrier, that carrier will
> > > sometimes
> > > take your /26 and /27 nets to help route inbound traffic but
> > > that carrier
> > > will not advertise those nets to its neighbors.....at least
> > > thats what I've
> > > heard.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any real world experience with this? Or is there a URL
> > > I could read up on?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > BM
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:36 GMT-3