From: Martin, Chris (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 16:48:50 GMT-3
Correct, you cannot have a NAT process for outside/inside on the same
interface. sorry ofr the confusion..
-C
----- Original Message -----
From: "Padhu (LFG)" <padhu@steinroe.com>
To: <chris@pacinter.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: NAT on a stick
> Its on the same router..fine but not on different interfaces. I am looking
> for inside and outside on the same interface or a trick around this.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chris@pacinter.net [mailto:chris@pacinter.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:06 PM
> To: Padhu (LFG)
> Subject: Re: NAT on a stick
>
>
> Sure Padhu,
>
> look at the configuration below. You will notice i have a Nat inside and
> outside on the same router:
> ip nat pool net-208 171.69.233.208 171.69.233.233 netmask 255.255.255.240
> ip nat inside source list 1 pool net-208
> !
> interface serial 0
> ip address 171.69.232.182 255.255.255.240
> ip nat outside <----- Translates to outside pool
> !
> interface ethernet 0
> ip address 192.168.1.94 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside <---- address on inside goes to outside
> pool
> !
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Padhu (LFG)" <padhu@steinroe.com>
> To: <chris@pacinter.net>
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:55 AM
> Subject: RE: NAT on a stick
>
>
> > Would you mind explaining a little bit ? Thanks .
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: chris@pacinter.net [mailto:chris@pacinter.net]
> > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 12:52 PM
> > To: 'Groupstudy '
> > Subject: Re: NAT on a stick
> >
> >
> > Yes its possible to have a nat inside / outside on the same
> router/interface
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Padhu (LFG)" <padhu@steinroe.com>
> > To: "'Price, Jamie'" <JPrice@isgteam.com>; "'Johnny Dedon '"
> > <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>; "'Groupstudy '" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:20 AM
> > Subject: NAT on a stick
> >
> >
> > > While we are on this subject, Is it possible to have inside and
outside
> on
> > > the same interface, basically NAT on a stick ?
> > >
> > > Cheers,Padhu
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Price, Jamie [mailto:JPrice@isgteam.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:39 PM
> > > To: 'Johnny Dedon '; 'Groupstudy '
> > > Subject: RE: Nat question
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a few customers that are using a router and CBAC. They have
> been
> > > provided a WAN IP address and a separate IP address range for their
own
> > use
> > > by their ISP. The intent being that the WAN address goes on the
> external
> > > i/f of the router and block is used for the router internal i/f, the
> > > firewall, and any other devices/statics that require public addresses.
> > >
> > > With the router/CBAC scenario though that configuration can't be
applied
> > > being as the internal router i/f is actually on the LAN. In these
cases
> I
> > > have used the allocated range for NAT while still using the WAN
address,
> > > which is a completely different subnet to the allocated block, for the
> > > external i/f address.
> > >
> > > If that's the sort of scenario you're talking about then yes.....it
> works
> > > fine.
> > >
> > > Jamie
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Johnny Dedon
> > > To: Groupstudy
> > > Sent: 5/6/01 4:39 PM
> > > Subject: Nat question
> > >
> > > Can nat be done using a single interface?
> > > I am asked to do nat to an address range that I don't have any
> > > interfaces
> > > belonging to.
> > >
> > > Johnny Dedon
> > > Senior Staff Consultant
> > > Exodus Professional Services
> > > johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> > > www.exodus.net
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:35 GMT-3