Re: Nat question

From: Rob Hopkins (rshopkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 06 2001 - 23:26:47 GMT-3

• Next message: Devender Singh: "RE: DLSW: How do I configure explorer firewall on DLSW"
• Previous message: Devender Singh: "DLSW: 3900"
• Maybe in reply to: Johnny Dedon: "Nat question"
• Next in thread: Price, Jamie: "RE: Nat question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
you don't need to have the ip or subnet, but you will need to pass from
a "nat inside" and "nat outside" (or vice versa), you can try loopbacks or
tunnels,
depending on your scenario, you may need to add static routes to force it
thru one of these.
I've had to do some pretty ugly "temporary" setups for customers in a
pinch...

Thanks,

Rob Hopkins

1.6180339887499
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
To: "Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 5:39 PM
Subject: Nat question

> Can nat be done using a single interface?
> I am asked to do nat to an address range that I don't have any interfaces
> belonging to.
>
> Johnny Dedon
> Senior Staff Consultant
> Exodus Professional Services
> johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> www.exodus.net
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Devender Singh: "RE: DLSW: How do I configure explorer firewall on DLSW"
• Previous message: Devender Singh: "DLSW: 3900"
• Maybe in reply to: Johnny Dedon: "Nat question"
• Next in thread: Price, Jamie: "RE: Nat question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:35 GMT-3