From: Mohamed Heeba (MAHeeba@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 07:46:12 GMT-3
hi
i got some docs in cisco telling that no way to aggregate nlsp to the EIGRP
so i think the only way as u said is to remove the aggreagtion of area1 to
let the EIGRP domain see the more specific routes ....this will lead to a
mistake in the solution.
if im wrong ..someone corrects me
thx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mas Kato [SMTP:tealp729@home.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:16 PM
> To: 'Mohamed Heeba'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: NLSP/EIGRP problem
>
> Mohamed,
>
> Just an FYI--I had just the opposite problem (so did somebody else in
> the archives).
>
> Once I installed route aggregation on R4 for area 1, R2 would see the
> aggregated route (NA in the table) and the one specific network leading
> into area 1. Only this one specific network would be redistributed into
> my IPX EIGRP AS, so the only thing I could ping in area 1 was this one
> specific network.
>
> On R2 (check my syntax), 'show ipx nlsp database' would show the
> aggregate LSP, but 'show ipx eigrp topology' wouldn't show any signs of
> it. So I believe something was broken in the redistribution.
>
> If I turned off route aggregation on R4 for area 1 all of the more
> specific networks would show up on R2 as NLSP externals (NX) and all
> would be redistributed into IPX EIGRP.
>
> Isn't this fun?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mas Kato
>
> P.S. I'm running 12.1(7)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Mohamed Heeba
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:21 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: NLSP/EIGRP problem
>
>
> guys
> while im doing fatkid lab 421 i got this problem
> nlsp two areas ,R2 is connected to Eigrp domain like that
>
> R1--area1---R4--area2--R2----Eigrp--R3
> the requirement is to aggregate between the NLSP two areas
> on R4 ,the aggregation is done and it is showing ok ,the more specific
> routes are suppressed to the major network .
> the problem is ,inside the Eigrp domain only the summary is propagting
> ,and
> the more specific routes is not there (which is logical).
> but the eigrp internal routers (like R3) are not able to ping the the
> more
> specific routes in area1(which is also logical).
> now my question is ,is there any way to let the Eigrp ping the more
> specific
> routes based on the major networks propagated to it (something to tell
> the
> eigrp that the routes are summary ??)
>
> Or should i disable the aggregation on r4 from area1 to area2 ???
>
> anyone can help ?
>
> thx
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:34 GMT-3