From: rsevier (rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 11:20:35 GMT-3
Mark- You can use a route map to redistribute only the connected interfaces
that you wish:
redistribute connected subnets route-map muther
access-list 1 permit 173.168.40.0 0.0.0.255
route-map muther permit 10
match ip address 1
and Lachlan is right about it redistributing everything that is showing up
as connected in the route table.
Raymond
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Lachlan Kidd
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:53 AM
To: mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp lab 2
Hi Mark,
I think the answer goes something like this. The 'redistribute' command
only works on what is in the route table. If you redistribute IGRP routes
then anything with an I next to it will get redistributed. The same applies
to connected routes. If it's in the route table with a 'C' next to it, it
will get redistributed regardless of what protocol is running on that
interface. HTH, feel free to let me know if I've missed the point
completely.
Regards,
Lachlan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 6:12:PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FW: ccbootcamp lab 2
Has anybody got any advice with respect to this one - see thread below:
The fundamental question is :
Does 'redistribute connected subnets' put E2 routes into OSPF even for
interfaces that are part of the OSPF process ?
Thanks
Mark
> ----------
> From: TCN CAPLAN Mark - Service Provider
> Sent: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2001 16:11
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: ccbootcamp lab 2
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a question about Marc's bootcamp lab2.
>
> The routing table for R1 shows two subnets advertised as E2 routes plus
> the summary:
>
> O E2 10.33.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.10.1.3, 00:00:01, Serial0.2
> O E2 10.33.1.0/24 [110/20] via 10.10.1.3, 00:00:01, Serial0.2
> O IA 10.33.0.0/16 [110/65] via 10.10.1.3, 00:00:02, Serial0.2
>
> Now the IA route comes from the 'area 3 range 10.33.0.0 255.255.0.0'
> statement on R3. And the E2 routes evidently come from the 'redistribute
> connected subnets' command on R3.
>
> I dont really understand why the E2 routes are there. The loopback
> interfaces concerned are in Area3 and part of the OSPF process. Its not as
> if the other connected interfaces are redistributed as E2 eg 10.3.1.1/16
> which is part of Area 0. So why these 2 subnets ? My understanding was
> that 'redistribute connected subnets' would only redistribute subnets on
> connected interfaces if they weren't part of the OSPF process. But the
> evidence shows otherwise. Is the rule that it redistributes any interfaces
> in a different area as E2 aswell.
>
> Any help would be appreciated
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
Check out current job vacancies at
http://www.clearstream.com/public/english/e_vacs.htm
IMPORTANT MESSAGE
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream
International does not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is
intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those
of the
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of
Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.
END OF DISCLAIMER
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:33 GMT-3