From: Brian Dennis (brian@xxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 20:51:49 GMT-3
About a year ago I was working for a very large ISP that will remain
nameless and we were able to make any change whenever we wanted. No change
management approval process, no nothing. We essentially just had to make
sure be backed up the old config. Engineers ran that company which made it a
great place to work. I'm not saying that's the best environment for making
changes on a network but it sure did make things easy 8)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
5G Networks, Inc.
brian@5g.net
(925) 260-2724
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Andrew Lennon
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:47 PM
> To: Ken Yeo; Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: BGP and no-sync
>
>
> I would hope that company IT processes would stop anyone making such a
> plonker of themselves, but then again....
>
> Seriously there was a thread a few weeks ago that covered the sync/no sync
> issue quite well. In short:
>
> Learn what your IGP's can and can't do!
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Ken Yeo
> Sent: 03 May 2001 22:46
> To: Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: BGP and no-sync
>
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Very agree!
>
> Ken
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@5g.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:52 PM
> Subject: RE: BGP and no-sync
>
>
> > You redistribute a full Internet routing table without any
> filtering into
> > your IGP and right after you type the redistribute command
> you'll say "hey
> > what happened to my router?". Then a couple minutes later
> you'll be saying
> > "hey what happened to my job?" 8)
> >
> > But if you're working in a lab environment I say redistribute away!
> >
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
> > 5G Networks, Inc.
> > brian@5g.net
> > (925) 260-2724
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Ken Yeo
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:19 AM
> > > To: mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: BGP and no-sync
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Or use:
> > >
> > > router ospf 1
> > > redistribute bgp subnet
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:38 PM
> > > Subject: BGP and no-sync
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a question regarding the effects of no-sync on BGP.
> > > >
> > > > The rule for synch, as far as I know is that an IBGP peer will not
> > > advertise
> > > > a BGP route to another peer (IBGP or EBGP) if that route does
> > > not exist in
> > > > the IGP.
> > > >
> > > > From my observations, a corollary to that is that a BGP
> peer will not
> > > > install learnt BGP routes into the routing table if sync
> is turned on
> > > > (assuming no redistribution). This is shown by comparing 'sh ip
> > > bgp' with
> > > > 'sh ip route'; if sync is on, then routes will be visible in the BGP
> > > routing
> > > > table, but will not be in the IP routing table. To get these BGP
> routes
> > > into
> > > > the IP routing table, one has to simply do a 'no sync'.
> > > >
> > > > I'm just thinking aloud here, but I would appreciate some
> > > confirmation of
> > > my
> > > > logic.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
> > > > Check out current job vacancies at
> > > http://www.clearstream.com/public/english/e_vacs.htm
> > > >
> > > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE
> > > >
> > > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream
> > > International does not
> > > > accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> > > >
> > > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
> > > legally privileged. It is
> > > > intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > > recipient,
> > > any disclosure,
> > > > copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
> > > reliance on it, is
> > > > prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this
> e-mail are
> > > those of the
> > > > individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
> > > them to be
> > > the views of
> > > > Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or
> subsidiaries.
> > > >
> > > > END OF DISCLAIMER
> > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:33 GMT-3