RE: BGP and no-sync

From: Andrew Lennon (andrew.lennon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 19:47:18 GMT-3


   
I would hope that company IT processes would stop anyone making such a
plonker of themselves, but then again....

Seriously there was a thread a few weeks ago that covered the sync/no sync
issue quite well. In short:

Learn what your IGP's can and can't do!

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ken Yeo
Sent: 03 May 2001 22:46
To: Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP and no-sync

Hi Brian,

Very agree!

Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@5g.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: BGP and no-sync

> You redistribute a full Internet routing table without any filtering into
> your IGP and right after you type the redistribute command you'll say "hey
> what happened to my router?". Then a couple minutes later you'll be saying
> "hey what happened to my job?" 8)
>
> But if you're working in a lab environment I say redistribute away!
>
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
> 5G Networks, Inc.
> brian@5g.net
> (925) 260-2724
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Ken Yeo
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:19 AM
> > To: mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: BGP and no-sync
> >
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Or use:
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute bgp subnet
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <mcaplan.cs@clearstream.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:38 PM
> > Subject: BGP and no-sync
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a question regarding the effects of no-sync on BGP.
> > >
> > > The rule for synch, as far as I know is that an IBGP peer will not
> > advertise
> > > a BGP route to another peer (IBGP or EBGP) if that route does
> > not exist in
> > > the IGP.
> > >
> > > From my observations, a corollary to that is that a BGP peer will not
> > > install learnt BGP routes into the routing table if sync is turned on
> > > (assuming no redistribution). This is shown by comparing 'sh ip
> > bgp' with
> > > 'sh ip route'; if sync is on, then routes will be visible in the BGP
> > routing
> > > table, but will not be in the IP routing table. To get these BGP
routes
> > into
> > > the IP routing table, one has to simply do a 'no sync'.
> > >
> > > I'm just thinking aloud here, but I would appreciate some
> > confirmation of
> > my
> > > logic.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
> > > Check out current job vacancies at
> > http://www.clearstream.com/public/english/e_vacs.htm
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE
> > >
> > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream
> > International does not
> > > accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> > >
> > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
> > legally privileged. It is
> > > intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > any disclosure,
> > > copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
> > reliance on it, is
> > > prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are
> > those of the
> > > individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
> > them to be
> > the views of
> > > Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.
> > >
> > > END OF DISCLAIMER
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:33 GMT-3