From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 13:09:13 GMT-3
Curtis,
You can put a *in-bound* distribute list in the router configuration section
to deny the undesirable route. The unwanted route would still appear in the L
ink-State database, but wouldn't be placed into the routing table....
Of course, the bad part about this is that you have to do this on all of the
routers that don't want to see your route, since the LSAs don't get filtered.
Any other ways anybody can think of?
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
franjime@cisco.com
At 10:57 AM 05/03/2001 -0400, Curtis Phillips wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I was curious whether anyone was aware of any means to control
>a route within a specific area within OPSF. More specifically,
>if a default-route is configured to a null on an ABR, and originated
>within OPSF, is there a means to control which area will propogate the
>route and which area will not? It seems logical that within an area lsa's
>must be consistent, but if the route were prevented from being inserted into a
n area, then it seems it should work.
>
>A distribute-list on an outbound interface is a no-no. (and really do address
the issue of keeping the orute out of the undesirable area anyway) so what are
the alternatives?
>
>Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
>Curtis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:33 GMT-3