From: Ken Yeo (kenyeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 18:02:01 GMT-3
Hi Rick,
Says the frame link is down, and ISDN DDR is running. If BGP and DLSw+ peers
are pointing to the frame interface's IP, they will break.
Ken Yeo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Burts" <burts@mentortech.com>
To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: Loopback or no loopback - DLSw+ / BGP ..etc
> Ken
>
> If the instructions do not specify to use loopback or not, I would
> advise that you should ask the proctor for clarification about it.
>
> I agree that loopbacks are frequently used for DLSw and BGP, but I
> am curious what you think would break in them if loopbacks were not
> used.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
> Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ext 6652
> 133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
> Annapolis Junction, Md 20701
>
> Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor Technologies.
> Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner and also
> a Cisco Professional Services partner.
> We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
> We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
> Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
> We also provide network consulting services including
> design, management, and problem solving.
> We have 21 CCIEs on our staff.
> We offer the breakthrough VLAB remote access technology for
> access to practice configuration on real equipment.
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ken Yeo wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the lab, if instruction didn't specifically say use loopback. Do we
use
> > loopback or do we not use loopback? If loopback interfaces are not used,
> > some technologies may break using dial backup mode. For example BGP,
DLSw+..
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Ken Yeo
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:32 GMT-3