From: David Bader (davidbader@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 04:14:49 GMT-3
hi all
i have just done lab 1 from ccbootcamp. i think they got something wrong in
their example-config. we do policy routing on the interfaces on the routers
which are connected to the frame cloud. They only do policy routing based on
the destination networks 137.20.20.0, 10.10.1.2, 11.0.0.0 and 10.10.1.5 (as
example on router 3). which is good, so we dont do policy routing if a packet
is sent to R4, but what if a packet is sent to a network which uses the
injected default route ? ok, we have a default route in our table, but where is
it
pointing ? next hop 10.10.1.2 which is not resolvable, we have to do policy
routing here too!
i did it the other way round, i denyed all destinations which have not to be
policy routed, like this:
access-list 101 deny ip any 10.3.0.0 0.0.255.255 log
access-list 101 deny ip any 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255 log
access-list 101 deny ip any 10.44.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip any 10.44.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip any 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 deny ip any 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any any
route-map BAHAMAS permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1
has someone any experience on this ? what do you think
btw: the labs from ccbootcamp are great!
dave
David Bader / Systems Engineer / NOS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ECON!S AG / eBusiness Solutions
- Electronic Business Solutions
- Network and Office Solutions
- Consulting and Projectmanagement
Neumattstrasse 7 / CH 8953 Dietikon / Switzerland
Phone ++41 (0) 1 744 73 73
Direct ++41 (0) 1 744 73 25
Fax ++ 41 (0) 1 744 73 99
<mailto:david.bader@econis.com>
<http://www.econis.com/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:32 GMT-3