From: Charlie Winckless (CharlieW@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 12:16:38 GMT-3
I found this on ASET lab testing, and it worked for me.
It makes the 'edge' router into an ABR for those routes,
effectively.
-- Charlie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Graves [mailto:jtg@lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:08 AM
> To: wgustavus@mentortech.com; jim.fitzpatrick@verizon.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF summar-address into IGRP
>
>
> Ooooooooh, clever. So by redistributing connected into OSPF,
> the connected
> route appears as external, which is then subject to the
> summary-address
> command. Nice. I'll have to play with this in my lab.
>
> One question -- does this still work if the connected network is also
> included as part of an OSPF area (via the "network" command)?
>
> At 11:02 AM 4/30/2001 -0400, Wayne Gustavus wrote:
> >I think you will find that the easiest, most consistent way
> to do this
> >(given most of the requirements listed so far) is to
> redistribute connected
> >into your OSPF process. The summary-address configured
> under the ospf
> >process will then correctly summarize to the /24 address
> which gets passed
> >to IGRP b/c you are redistributing OSPF to IGRP. This is
> all configured on
> >the ASBR and it works. Of course, normal tips for
> redistribution apply:
> >don't forget subnets parameter and probably want a route-map
> to control
> >which connected routes get injected.
> >
> >HTH,
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:02 GMT-3