From: Mas Kato (tealp729@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 17:26:46 GMT-3
Hi Mike,
Thanks, I'll pass your observations on to your colleague... :-)
Regards,
Mas
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Martinek [mailto:mikemart@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 2:44 PM
To: Mas Kato
Cc: 'Pat Bodin'; gfarber@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bridging IP over SR/TLB
Mas,
I see you are assigning a MAC Address starting with 0X40 to the ethernet
0/0
interface on R3. Since this is not a token ring "non-canonical"
interface you
should use "0X02" for this interface.
Regards,
Mike
At 12:02 PM 4/29/2001 -0700, Mas Kato wrote:
>Interesting... So 'multiring ip' did indeed break the SNA pings?
>
>Supposedly, 'multiring' without any parameters will allow the routing
of
>layer-3-routable packets only to nodes directly connected to the local
>token ring... Do you think if the SR/TLB were more than one ring away
in
>your scenario it would still be possible to pass both SNA and IP pings?
>
>Mas
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pat Bodin [mailto:pbodin@cisco.com]
>Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 9:11 AM
>To: Mas Kato; gfarber@cisco.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Bridging IP over SR/TLB
>
>
>You can use the multiring token ring interface command without the ip
>setting and it won't break your sna pings. Plus, you will get your ip
>pings. Multiring generates rifs and w/o rifs the bridge (srb) doesn't
>know
>where to send the traffic. This would be different if the bridge was
>transparent.
>
>Pat
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Mas Kato
>Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 8:37 PM
>To: gfarber@cisco.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Bridging IP over SR/TLB
>
>
>Yeah--the current EIGRP-related thread sounds interesting--but to get
>the IP pings across, try 'bitswap-layer3-addresses' in R8's transparent
>bridge and moving 'multiring ip' from R8's to0/0 to R2's to0/0... Hope
>it doesn't break your SNA pings <g>.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mas Kato
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>crl
>Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 11:30 AM
>To: Groupstudy
>Subject: Re: Bridging IP over SR/TLB
>
>
>Check out the bitswap-layer3-addresses command... (although in practice
>I
>find it doesn't work with _all_ types of IP traffic)
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Guy Farber" <gfarber@cisco.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 8:45 AM
>Subject: Bridging IP over SR/TLB
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to bridge ip over the following network:
> >
> > R2 - (TR 411) - R8 - (Ethernet) - R7 - (Ethernet) - R3
> >
> > R7 is bridging IP and works ok (I can ping from R3 to R8). R8 runs
>SR/TLB
> > and that works fine as well (I can sna ping from R2 to R3). What I
can
>seem
> > to get is an ip ping form R2 to R3.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > R2:
> >
> > version 12.1
> >
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> >
> > service timestamps log uptime
> >
> > no service password-encryption
> >
> > !
> >
> > hostname R2
> >
> > !
> >
> > ip subnet-zero
> >
> > no ip finger
> >
> > no ip domain-lookup
> >
> > !
> >
> > cns event-service server
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface TokenRing0/0
> >
> > mac-address 4000.0000.0002
> >
> > ip address 161.22.2.5 255.255.255.0
> >
> > ring-speed 16
> >
> > !
> >
> > snasw cpname NETA.R2
> >
> > snasw port R2TK0 TokenRing0/0 conntype nohpr
> >
> > snasw link R3E0 port R2TK0 rmac 0200.0000.00c0
> >
> >
> > R3:
> >
> > version 12.0
> >
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> >
> > service timestamps log uptime
> >
> > no service password-encryption
> >
> > !
> >
> > hostname R8
> >
> > !
> >
> > ip subnet-zero
> >
> > no ip routing
> >
> > no ip domain-lookup
> >
> > !
> >
> > source-bridge ring-group 1000
> >
> > source-bridge transparent 1000 3 1 1
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> >
> > ip address 161.22.2.4 255.255.255.0
> >
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >
> > no ip route-cache
> >
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface TokenRing0/0
> >
> > no ip address
> >
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >
> > no ip route-cache
> >
> > ring-speed 16
> >
> > multiring ip
> >
> > source-bridge 411 1 1000
> >
> > source-bridge spanning
> >
> >
> > R7:
> >
> > version 12.0
> >
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> >
> > service timestamps log uptime
> >
> > no service password-encryption
> >
> > !
> >
> > hostname R7
> >
> > !
> >
> > !
> >
> > ip subnet-zero
> >
> > no ip routing
> >
> > no ip domain-lookup
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> >
> > no ip address
> >
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >
> > no ip route-cache
> >
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface Ethernet0/1
> >
> > no ip address
> >
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >
> > no ip route-cache
> >
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > !
> >
> > R3:
> >
> > version 12.1
> >
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> >
> > service timestamps log uptime
> >
> > no service password-encryption
> >
> > !
> >
> > hostname R3
> >
> > !
> >
> > memory-size iomem 10
> >
> > ip subnet-zero
> >
> > no ip domain-lookup
> >
> > !
> >
> > cns event-service server
> >
> > !
> >
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> >
> > mac-address 4000.0000.0003
> >
> > ip address 161.22.2.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > !
> >
> > snasw cpname NETA.R3
> >
> > snasw port R3E0 Ethernet0/0 conntype nohpr
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Guy
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:01 GMT-3