From: Jason1 (jason1@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 14:42:39 GMT-3
Two way to verify, check what happen if you turn on "No Sync" and check your
route table, do you have the exact network entry... BGP requirement is that
the network/route must be in the route table...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Van Oene" <pvo@usermail.com>
To: "Jerry Hutcheson" <jhutches@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: BGP RouteReflector and VLSM
> What do you mean by "injecting a network?" Do you mean you have this route
in your BGP and want the RR client to learn about it? In that case, make
sure the Next_Hop for the route is reachable. If you want to redistribute
it, or originate it, it has to exist in a routing table. Hence, a static
route on the originating box would be helpful.
>
> Pete
>
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 4/29/2001 at 11:17 AM Jerry Hutcheson wrote:
>
> >I am having trouble injecting a network into my RR Client BGP routing
> >table, the actual interface address is 145.7.23.193 255.255.255.192.
> >
> >I used the statement under my routing process on the RR Client "Network
> >145.7.23.0 mask 255.255.255.192", but it just would not pull into my BGP
> >routing process.
> >
> >So then I guessed that maybe it needed to be on my route reflector but
> >this did not work either. I cleared IP BGP several times with no luck.
The
> >interface is completely reachable by all routers in my lab scenario.
> >
> >The only reason I thought it may be a VLSM issue is because I also have a
> >FLSM /24 on this router and it's route was easily injected into my bgp
> >route table. Any ideas on what I may be missing?
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >jerry
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:01 GMT-3