Re: BGP RouteReflector and VLSM

From: Peter Van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 12:40:36 GMT-3


   
What do you mean by "injecting a network?" Do you mean you have this route in y
our BGP and want the RR client to learn about it? In that case, make sure the
Next_Hop for the route is reachable. If you want to redistribute it, or origin
ate it, it has to exist in a routing table. Hence, a static route on the origi
nating box would be helpful.

Pete

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 4/29/2001 at 11:17 AM Jerry Hutcheson wrote:

>I am having trouble injecting a network into my RR Client BGP routing
>table, the actual interface address is 145.7.23.193 255.255.255.192.
>
>I used the statement under my routing process on the RR Client "Network
>145.7.23.0 mask 255.255.255.192", but it just would not pull into my BGP
>routing process.
>
>So then I guessed that maybe it needed to be on my route reflector but
>this did not work either. I cleared IP BGP several times with no luck. The
>interface is completely reachable by all routers in my lab scenario.
>
>The only reason I thought it may be a VLSM issue is because I also have a
>FLSM /24 on this router and it's route was easily injected into my bgp
>route table. Any ideas on what I may be missing?
>
>thanks,
>
>jerry
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:01 GMT-3