From: Shane Miles (smiles@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 13:09:37 GMT-3
Looking at this, but having never used it however, it reminds me of
the way the PIX NATs. 10.10.10.1 will NAT to 12.12.12.1, 10.10.10.2 ->
12.12.12.2 etc. That's why you can only specify a single mask. If each
network had a its own mask you would have an unequal number of addresses and
some addresses would either not get NATed or some some addresses on the
NATed side would be wasted. This is just my shot in the dark.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Hopkins [mailto:rshopkins@earthlink.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 11:44 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ip nat inside source static network
Has anyone used or seen a reference to the following NAT commands?
ip nat inside source static network 10.10.10.0 12.12.12.0 /24
ip nat outside source static network 12.12.12.0 10.50.50.0 /24
I tested with some NAT debugs, the manner in which they operate seems a bit
strange....
The 12.0 reference doesnt seem to list the "network" option..
Thanks,
Rob Hopkins
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:57 GMT-3