From: David Siwula (DSiwula@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 23:17:58 GMT-3
The default does not show up in the config. That might explain it.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant W. Patten [mailto:gpatten@lucent.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Haohong Lin; CCIELab
Subject: RE: IS-IS without CLNS routing
Yes. It uses CLNS. But the clns routing statement is not in the config
and I don't know why it is necessary because clns isn't being routed
just
as ip routing protocol packets aren't routed. They only go within the
locally connected segments.
-Grant
At 08:33 AM 4/22/2001 +0800, Haohong Lin wrote:
>When you run IS-IS routing process, CLNS routing automatically turns
on.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Grant
>W. Patten
>Sent: 2001 04 22 9:30
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: IS-IS without CLNS routing
>
>
>I was in a discussion with some colleagues about using IS-IS without
>enabling CLNS routing. They pointed out that the chapters in the
Caslow
>and the Doyle books both list the first step for configuring IS-IS as
being
>turning on CLNS routing. However, I tested it out to be sure and it
seems
>you don't have to enable CLNS routing to get IS-IS to work correctly.
This
>makes sense, as CLNS packets (like LSA's) are only going across a
single
>data-link and do not need to be routed. It's not a big deal, but I'd
like
>to understand why both books seem to agree that it is necessary to turn
>CLNS routing on. What am I missing?
>
>-Grant
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:53 GMT-3