From: Darren Hosking (dhosking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 13:41:22 GMT-3
I'm trying to configure BGP with the EBGP connections over NAT (ie one BGP
router using registered addresses, the other using private addresses with a
static NAT translation for the EBGP peer to connect to). I receive the
routes for the other AS no problems but believe I will have an issue with
the next-hop of routes I advertise.
What address is used for the next-hop address by default and for neighbor
next-hop-self?
If I use a route-map to set the next-hop address of outbound BGP routes, can
I set it to a registered IP address known to the peer but not known to the
IGP so the neighbor gets the correct registered address for routes
advertised?
Is BGP with NAT a reasonable thing to do? If not, how can you have multiple
connections to ISP's behind (say) PIX firewalls?
Darren
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:53 GMT-3