From: Rodgers Moore (rodgers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2001 - 13:56:52 GMT-3
I don't think it was asking for summarization like the area-range command but
rather a consiolidation of the network statements. If you want to denote what
interfaces belong to what areas, then this mask is acceptable for the network
statement. Heck, all ones works just as well. Wild card mask and network mask
aren't the same thing.
Rodgers Moore
louie kouncar wrote:
> Dave,
>
> You are right, This should be 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255, 6 in the third octet
> will break the subnetting rules and will not work, the reason is if you do
> the 255-248 you will get 7 and not 6. I am not aware of a 255.255.249.0
> mask, which will be the case if this was 0.0.6.0
>
> I hope I am right.....
>
> Thanks
>
> Louie J. Kouncar (CCIE)/Written
> TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> UUNET
> W-703-343-6645
> C-703-304-2460
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> David Bader
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: CCIE Lab; Chuck Larrieu
> Subject: AW: wildcard mask problem
>
> This wouldn't work, because it it not a contignuous wildcard:
> 00000000.00000000.00000110.11111111
>
> dave
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:chuck@cl.cncdsl.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2001 08:40
> An: David Bader
> Betreff: RE: wildcard mask problem
>
> Try 192.168.0.0 0.0.6.255
>
> Tell me what that covers.
>
> to quote a sage - think different.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> David Bader
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:27 PM
> To: "louie kouncar" <lkouncar@UU.NET>
> Subject: RE: wildcard mask problem
>
> This is correct, but you can only summarise 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.7.255. so
> you either summarise all of them, or you need two statements.
>
> Dave
>
> > Bruce,
> >
> > you are totally correct, my mistake, I was more concerned with the third
> > octet of the wildcard mask since that was where the question was directed
> > at.
> >
> >
> > it should be 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 area 0
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Louie J. Kouncar (CCIE)/Written
> > TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> > UUNET
> > W-703-343-6645
> > C-703-304-2460
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:37 PM
> > To: louie kouncar; 'Bob Dixon'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: wildcard mask problem
> >
> >
> > Louie,
> >
> > Please correct me if I am wrong. Should not the summarized network address
> > be 192.168.0.0 because 192.168.2.0 does not summarize 192.168.4.0.
> >
> > The third octet for both networks.
> > 192.168.2.0 is 00000010
> > 182.168.4.0 is 00000100
> >
> > If that is not correct, could you please explain.
> >
> > Bruce
> > bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "louie kouncar" <lkouncar@UU.NET>
> > To: "'Bob Dixon'" <bobdixon@mediaone.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:24 PM
> > Subject: RE: wildcard mask problem
> >
> >
> > > Ops,
> > >
> > > That should be 0.0.7.255
> > >
> > > sorry for the typo
> > >
> > > Louie J. Bouncer (CCIE)/Written
> > > TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> > > UUNET
> > > W-703-343-6645
> > > C-703-304-2460
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Bob Dixon
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:38 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: wildcard mask problem
> > >
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I should know how to do this, but I can't seem to get it.
> > >
> > > Question:
> > > take the following:
> > > network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > > network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > >
> > > and create one network statement that summarizes the two.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bob
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> --
> GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
> http://www.gmx.net
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:51 GMT-3