From: David Bader (davidbader@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2001 - 13:07:49 GMT-3
This wouldn't work, because it it not a contignuous wildcard:
00000000.00000000.00000110.11111111
dave
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:chuck@cl.cncdsl.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2001 08:40
An: David Bader
Betreff: RE: wildcard mask problem
Try 192.168.0.0 0.0.6.255
Tell me what that covers.
to quote a sage - think different.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
David Bader
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:27 PM
To: "louie kouncar" <lkouncar@UU.NET>
Subject: RE: wildcard mask problem
This is correct, but you can only summarise 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.7.255. so
you either summarise all of them, or you need two statements.
Dave
> Bruce,
>
> you are totally correct, my mistake, I was more concerned with the third
> octet of the wildcard mask since that was where the question was directed
> at.
>
>
> it should be 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 area 0
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Louie J. Kouncar (CCIE)/Written
> TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> UUNET
> W-703-343-6645
> C-703-304-2460
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Williams [mailto:bruce@williamsnetworking.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:37 PM
> To: louie kouncar; 'Bob Dixon'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: wildcard mask problem
>
>
> Louie,
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong. Should not the summarized network address
> be 192.168.0.0 because 192.168.2.0 does not summarize 192.168.4.0.
>
> The third octet for both networks.
> 192.168.2.0 is 00000010
> 182.168.4.0 is 00000100
>
> If that is not correct, could you please explain.
>
> Bruce
> bruce@williamsnetworking.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "louie kouncar" <lkouncar@UU.NET>
> To: "'Bob Dixon'" <bobdixon@mediaone.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:24 PM
> Subject: RE: wildcard mask problem
>
>
> > Ops,
> >
> > That should be 0.0.7.255
> >
> > sorry for the typo
> >
> > Louie J. Bouncer (CCIE)/Written
> > TCO3 Senior Data Center Engineer
> > UUNET
> > W-703-343-6645
> > C-703-304-2460
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Bob Dixon
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:38 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: wildcard mask problem
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I should know how to do this, but I can't seem to get it.
> >
> > Question:
> > take the following:
> > network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> >
> > and create one network statement that summarizes the two.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bob
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
-- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:51 GMT-3