Re: Redistributing OSPF /22 to IGRP /24, same mayor network

From: BIKEMAN (krode@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:13:26 GMT-3


   
summary address command

Allows you to summarise OSPF to /24. The docco CD says this is for
summarising info coming INTO OSPF but it works both ways.

BUT, once you summarise OSPF to /24 the sumary is a more direct route than
the real IP range (so, routing issues). Therefore run "ip ospf network
point-to-multipoint" on the interface with the /22 mask to generate a /32
route that will give you a more specific route than the summary to make your
routing work again.

I have found that with enough patience and persistance it is possible to get
almost any route into a classfull protocol.

Rudi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Chen" <wchen@iloka.com>
To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:13 PM
Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF /22 to IGRP /24, same mayor network

> The "area x range" command won't work in this case because it won't change
> the way directly connected networks are redistributed to IGRP. Using
static
> routes in this case is preferred because you only need four of them.
>
> However, if you were asked to redistribute /20 OSPF into /28 IGRP (in this
> case you have to configure 256 static routes!) or you were not allowed to
> use static routes, then you could configure a separate major network with
a
> /24 mask in OSPF domain, say, 192.168.1.0/24 and redistribute it into
IGRP.
> From the IGRP router, configure this network to be your default-network to
> let you reach the OSPF 172.16.x.x/20 networks.
>
> If you are now allowed to use either static or IGRP default-network, then
> you're stuck.
>
> Walter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michel GASPARD [mailto:mgaspard@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:12 AM
> To: Alejandro Cadarso
> Cc: ccielab
> Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF /22 to IGRP /24, same mayor network
>
>
> Alejandro,
>
> Did you already tried the "area x range" command?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michel
>
>
> Alejandro Cadarso wrote:
> >
> > I'm playing with the following scenario and was unable to imagine how
> > can I get 172.16.24.0/22 redistributed from ospf to igrp for r2
> > inserting it in its routing table.
> >
> > Any suggestions will be appreciated. Of course neither Default routing
> > nor static are allowed.
> >
> > ospf igrp loop0
> > -------------r1------------------r2----172.16.6.0/24
> >
> > 172.16.24.0/22 172.16.36.0/24
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:49 GMT-3